ENA Update – February 2nd Meeting

The February ENA meeting covered a lot of ground, but we still had time for a coffee and cookie break and finished a bit early.  Formal minutes will be published later this month, but I wanted to give you a sense of what is happening.  There was some fun stuff!

The South Neighborhood will be painting the Caretaker’s House this summer and has had a wonderful Exterior Color Report done.  It shows the house in a variety of color combinations and explains the historical and/or environmental reasons behind them.  They are requesting input, so feel free to participate in their Caretakers House color survey.  Help and donations would be appreciated.  Contact Steve Wilson at caretakershouse@gmail.com.

 Something else fun was to see the results of our first online survey.  As you will remember, it was related to the proposed Padden Trails development.  From 404 newsletters sent out, we had 50 survey responses.   Of those, 72% opposed the increased density, 26% supported it and 2% had no opinion.  48% supported use of the housing infill toolkit, 10% had no opinion and 42% did not support its use.  After discussion, those in attendance voted to support the letter drafted by the Coalition of Southside Neighborhoods, which conforms to our survey results, so I signed it at the CSN meeting February 20th.  To all of you who responded to the survey, well done! Based on our first trial, you will be seeing more surveys, so monitor this space as well as the newsletter.

 Those attending the February meeting voted to add the clause regarding train traffic concerns to our  proposed Neighborhood Plan.  We will have it presented to the city before the April 1 deadline, so be prepared to participate in and hear about hearings as they arise through the summer and fall.

The final draft of the Edgemoor Neighborhood Bylaws was formally presented and discussed.  We will be voting on it at our March meeting so take a look and see what you think.  It is also posted on the website.  

 The meeting schedule for the rest of the year is set.  Our annual meeting will be held June 7th, at which time elections will be held…more on that later.  We are also planning to have a speaker, so if there is someone you have been dying to hear, let us know!  There will be no meetings in July and August, but we will resume our monthly meeting schedule in September.  You will probably be getting surveys regarding possible speakers and/or activities, so put on your thinking cap and let’s come up with some cool stuff!

Enjoy the beginning of spring! (as soon as the rain stops)   Lylene

Show Shoe Fest at Mt Baker

Plan for Fun in the Snow on March 17th!

Whatcom Events will be sponsoring Snowshoe Fest 2012 to be held at Heather Meadows, at the Mount Baker Ski Area.  Snowshoe Fest 2012 is on March 17, from 10:00 am – 2:00 PM.  Bring your snowshoes for the most fun you’ve ever had on St. Patrick’s Day.  If you can walk, you can snowshoe!

Wear your “green” and be entered into a special raffle drawing.  Free snowshoe rentals provided if you don’t have your own.

Activities include:

  • Snowshoe Races for Kids and Adults (Free for kids 12 and under, $5.00 for teens and adults)
  • Treasure Hunts in the Snow
  • Free Raffle Drawing for everyone with prizes donated by local businesses
  • Free hot chocolate and snacks
  • Free Avalanche Awareness talk by local outdoors expert
  • Free Snowcave Demo
  • Snowslides for kids
  • More snow games for adults and kids…

Cheryl Kaizuka
Special Projects
Whatcom Events
Home of the World Famous Ski to Sea Race
PO Box 2011, Bellingham, WA  98227
Phone-360-746-8861

Padden Trails Development Proposals

We just received the email below from Dick Conoby of the Samish Neighborhood.  Here are links to the Padden Trails Draft Development Agreement and Padden Trails Development Plan (Map).

Can you make distribution of this email to the coalition of South Neighborhoods?  It is the draft of a development agreement that the Padden Trails LLC has prepared to accompany the request for the Comp Plan change for Padden Trails.  Note Section 6 of the agreement that speaks to the issue of storm water runoff.  The plan is essentially to dump all the runoff into Padden Creek.

Bellingham City Council – Notice of Public Hearing

Padden Trails Hearings

Notice is hereby given that the Bellingham City Council will hold 2 public hearings on Monday, March 12, 2012 @ 7:00 PM,or as soon thereafter as possible, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 210 Lottie Street, Bellingham, Washington,to take public comment on the following:

1) Consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone of 113 acres of property generally located in Areas 5 and 6 of the Samish Neighborhood, between I-5, Padden Lake Park, and Padden Creek. The applicants request to change the zoning and land use designations from Single Family, 20,000 square foot density to Residential Multi, Planned, 10,000 square foot density. Applicant: Free Spirit Enterprises, LLC. Owner: Padden Trails, LLC.

2) Consideration of a Development Agreement associated with a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone of 113 acres of property generally located in Areas 5 and 6 of the Samish Neighborhood, between I-5, Padden Lake Park, and Padden Creek. The applicants request to change the zoning and land use designations from Single Family, 20,000 square foot density to Residential Multi, Planned, 10,000 square foot density. Applicant: Free Spirit Enterprises, LLC. Owner: Padden Trails, LLC.

Detailed information can be found at: http://www.cob.org/web/commsnl.nsf

Staff Contact: Kathy Bell, Planner II, (360) 778-8347 or kbell@cob.org

Anyone wishing to comment on this topic is invited to attend; or if unable to attend, to send your comments, in writing to the Council Office, 210 Lottie Street, or email to ccmail@cob.org, or fax to 778-8101, to be received prior to 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, March 7 th, to be included in the agenda packet. Comment received after that time will be distributed to Council but not included in the published meeting materials.

FOR OUR CITIZENS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, the Council Chambers is fully accessible. Elevator access to the second floor is available at City Hall’s west entrance. Hearing assistance is available and a receiver may be checked out through the clerk prior to the evening session. For additional accommodations, persons are asked to contact the Legislative Assistant at 778-8200 at least 3 working days in advance of the meeting. Thank you.

People for Lake Padden

Proposed Change to Zoning Near Lake Padden

We recently received the following letter via the South Neighborhood.  It is from Betsy Gross, Director of People for Lake Padden, and her contact information is at the bottom if you would like more information.  Basically, several years ago the County Council removed an area around Yew Street Road south to Lake Padden from Bellingham’s Urban Growth Area, thereby limiting development.  Water quality studies of the lake have been ongoing.  There is now a proposal to put that area back in the UGA, and People for Lake Padden wants that decision postponed until more data is collected.  They are asking for support from other neighborhoods.  If you would like to hear a presentation regarding this issue at one of our meetings, let the board know via a comment to this post or an email to any of us.   Lylene  

 I am attaching two documents:
1.  Fact sheet providing a brief description of just who People for Lake Padden is, and what we are doing;
2.  Boilerplate letter of support for People for Lake Padden’s request of County Council to defer the decision to reinstate UGA status to the lands falling within the Lake Padden watershed until the scientific studies underway are completed and can inform the discussion, resulting in a knowledge based decision about development scenarios.  When you open it you will see that I have provided County Council members’ email addresses and phone numbers to make it easy for your email recipients to respond to our request.
 
County Council has scheduled this proposal for review/discussion/ vote at their February 28th meeting.  Here is the link which takes the reader to the original County Council bill describing the proposal at hand:  http://www.co.whatcom.wa.us/council/meetings/council/packet/archived/2011/packet1206.pdf   The reader who checks this link out would need to scroll to pp 916-929 to read AB 2011-210, the proposal we are concerned about. 
Letters of support would be greatly appreciated and, obviously, the more the better.  They’ll need to be received by County Council prior to their February 28th meeting.  Of course, it would also be wonderful if interested citizens would also like to attend this meeting and testify on our behalf during the public comments period.
 
I appreciate your support for getting this letter distributed to both the South Neighborhood Assn and the South Side Neighborhood Coalition boards/ membership.  It almost goes without saying that Lake Padden is well worth preserving and that we all have the same goal in mind – namely, smart growth – which includes protecting our natural resources for the enjoyment of current and future citizens.
 
Please let folks with questions know I am happy to provide more information; they just neet to call me at 715-1173 and/ or by checking out our website: www.p4lp.org. We also have a speakers’ bureau and are happy to attend a gathering to provide a briefing on our project.
 
Betsy Gross, Director
People for Lake Padden
www.p4lp.org
715-1173
 

 

Edgemoor Neighborhood Asked to Support Samish Neighborhood

 CSN (Coalition of Southside Neighborhoods) Report

It has been an active several weeks since our last Edgemoor Neighborhood meeting, and most of the news came out of the Coalition of Southside Neighbors meeting attended by John Erickson and Lylene on January 17th.  CSN is an organization of representatives from 6 southside neighborhoods:  South, South Hill, Fairhaven, Happy Valley, Samish & Edgemoor.

The first issue was raised by the Samish Neighborhood regarding the Padden Trails development.  They are opposed to both the rezone allowing higher density and the application of the Infill Housing Toolkit in the development, and have asked CSN for support.  After discussion, CSN members agreed to support opposition to the higher density, but felt the Infill Housing Toolkit was appropriate in that area and could result in a smaller environmental impact.  These links will take you to the Padden Trails website, a Letter in Opposition, the City of Bellingham’s Infill Housing Toolkit and the letter proposed by CSN.

CSN support for a neighborhood’s position involves discussion of the issue by the presidents and representatives of the 6 neighborhoods and drafting a letter to the city stating that position.  The neighborhood presidents then get input from their members and, if appropriate, sign the letter.  In the past this discussion has been held and the decision made at an Edgemoor Neighborhood meeting.  As a result, a small number of Edgemoor neighbors have made decisions representing the entire Neighborhood.  In an effort to more accurately represent Neighborhood sentiment, we will instead be polling Neighborhood members for opinions via a very short survey at the following link   http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/M9RJR7V.  Please exercise your right to vote! 

 The second issue was raised by the Fairhaven Neighborhood regarding their new neighborhood plan.  It has been reviewed by the city and is moving forward in the process.  The planning department proposed building height limits greater than those requested by the draft plan, and the Neighborhood asked for CSN to go on record supporting the lower limits.  After discussion, there was not consensus regarding this support, so no letter was drafted.  These links will take you to the letter from Fairhaven Neighbors to the City of Bellingham Planning Department regarding the Fairhaven Plan and City of Bellingham website regarding that plan.                            .

 The third topic discussed concerned an Edgemoor Neighborhood proposal to sponsor another forum on the Gateway Pacific project.  This idea had been raised earlier as a possible meeting with a BNSF representative.  During the CSN discussion, it was expanded to a meeting with representatives from Gateway Pacific, ReSources, BNSF, Whatcom County Planning Department and Department of Ecology.  CSN agreed to work collaboratively toward this meeting, with the Edgemoor Neighborhood taking the lead.  At this point, we have set a date of March 27th.  Watch the blog and the newsletter for updates.   

 

 

 

Edgemoor Neighborhood Meeting Summary

 Edgemoor Neighborhood Meeting January 5, 2012

 Following is an informal account of our meeting – the formal minutes will be available later.

We met in the library of Fairhaven Middle School…it was warm, bright and quiet. Three board members (Lauri Grove, John Erickson and I) and 5 general members were present.  We covered a lot of ground, so if you have questions, don’t hesitate to call John, Lauri or me…or reply to this post!

                                                            MNAC

John reported that MNAC (Mayor’s Neighborhood Advisory Committee) is in transition.  Linda Stewart, the former liaison, has moved and, of course, we have a new mayor.  The one required function of MNAC is to review all proposed plans and developments, and provide an opinion on them to the planning commission.  The review is primarily done by a sub-committee which currently has 3 members.  It is a lot of work and time frames are fairly tight.   

Through MNAC, the city currently provides us with notices of all scheduled city meetings, permit applications and progress, The Blockwatcher, insurance for our association and a platform for input.  They are asking us to let them know if there are other things they can provide to help us.  If you have ideas, contact John Erickson (john@northwestcampers.com) before the next MNAC meeting on January 18th.

Communication within the ENA

Primary communication venues are still the website and the monthly newsletter, although readership of the blog appears to be growing.  My personal goal for the year is to increase opportunities for communication from the membership to the board.  Getting to monthly meetings isn’t always that easy…and they aren’t always that interesting…but the association is frequently asked to take positions on issues in the greater community.  I am very uncomfortable doing that with input only from the few members who attend the meetings.  Consequently, we will be encouraging use of the blog & email as well as investigating use of online surveys for very specific questions.

We are often approached by groups who want to present information on their particular cause to our group.  We are now offering them the opportunity to provide information which will be posted to the blog.  If the membership wants further information, a meeting can be held.  This will provide greater exposure for them and allow us to focus our meetings on the issues important to the neighborhood.

Special Issues

Chuckanut Ridge:  Bob Gibb has donated funds to a designated fund held by the WWU foundation.  The goal is to raise money for the purchase of an interest in the Chuckanut Ridge property for Huxley College.  Details are being discussed.  At this point WWU and the foundation are not parties to these plans; the foundation is simply holding the funds. 

Gateway Pacific Terminal:  BNSF has agreed to attend a meeting to answer questions regarding train traffic.  We may work with the CSN (Coalition of Southside Neighborhoods) to put together such a meeting.  A new organization is forming to block coal train traffic via an initiative.  Board members will be meeting with a representative mid-month to learn more.

Lummi Island Quarry Expansion:  A group opposed to this has requested support.  Refer to two prior blog posts.  They would like to come and speak…this will be arranged if the neighborhood shows enough interest.

Bylaws

Lauri Grove, chair of the bylaws committee, reported that good progress has been made on revising them to more accurately conform to what the ENA currently is.  The biggest change is to streamline the bylaws, using them to establish the basic structure of the organization, and add Rules of Procedure, which can be more easily changed to reflect changing conditions.  The committee will meet at least once more prior to the next meeting.  Watch the blog for a draft.

Neighborhood Plan

The board had agreed earlier that an  Amendment to the membership approved plan stating concern about train impacts was appropriate.  Language was approved for presentation to the membership, and we will be voting on it at the next meeting.  The deadline for presentation of the plan to the city is April 1.    

Goals & Budget

We looked at income and expenditures over the past year, and basic anticipated costs were listed.  Further discussion will occur in conjunction with determination of our focus and goals for the year.  Two items raised were improved neighborhood communication and public safety

Meeting Schedule

There will be no meeting in August, and possibly in July.  The annual meeting, with elections, will be held in June.  Neighborhood associations are required to hold 4 meetings per year, but may hold more as needed.  The timing and purpose of meetings will be discussed further as part of the bylaws.

Participation in Other Organizations

ABN (Association of Bellingham Neighborhoods)  This group has been inactive for some time, although its website is still viable.  We will ask Sandie to arrange for elimination of our information on that site, instead establishing a link to our website.

CSN (Coalition of Southside Neighborhoods)  This group consists of presidents and representatives from the South, South Hill, Fairhaven and Edgemoor neighborhoods.  There has been discussion about asking the Samish neighborhood to join.  Few meetings of this group have been held over the past several years.  The most recent joint activity was the Candidates Forum in which we participated in October.  There is interest in revitalizing this group with the emergence of proposals such as the Fairhaven neighborhood plan, the Gateway Pacific Terminal and the Padden Creek Trails development.  John & Lylene will be attending a meeting January 17th.  We are going to be asked for input and the position of our neighborhood on these issues at this meeting and later.  It is very important that your voice is heard, so please let us know what you think.  A report of the meeting will be posted on the blog.

As I said at the beginning, it was a very full meeting, but we closed at 9:00.  Please email or comment here, ask questions and give us direction.

 

 

 

Remember the New Meeting Place!

Edgemoor Neighborhood Meetings Moved to Fairhaven Middle School

Just a reminder that the Edgemoor Neighborhood meeting tomorrow evening, January 5th, will be in the library in Fairhaven Middle School from 7 to 9 pm.  We have arranged for access from the first parking lot beyond the bus loading area off Park Ridge.  This will provide for a short, well-lighted, level entry into the building.  These entry doors will be locked after 7:30, so arrive accordingly.

Here is the Agenda

Hope to see you there!

Lummi Island Quarry Expansion Update

In October, we posted information regarding the proposed Lummi Island Quarry Expansion.  We recently received the following update.  If you would like to attend a presentation regarding the project at an Edgemoor Neighborhood Meeting, leave a comment at the end of this post or contact lylene.lj@gmail.com.  If there is sufficient interest, we will schedule a presentation. 

I want to thank you for posting the information about the proposed expansion of the quarry on Lummi Island.   During the fall several new developments have taken place. 

First, a website has been created to present the latest developments regarding the MRL proposal.  That website is lummiislandquarry.com.   We would appreciate it if you could include a link to that website.   Second, we have put together a video that outlines the principal issues associated with the quarry operations.  This video can be accessed on the website.  Here is a short list of the recent developments.

  1.  The Lummi Island Conservancy had filed an appeal of the Whatcom County Planning Department conclusion that there would be no significant environmental effects associated with the zoning change (Rural Forestry to Mineral Resource Land, MRL).  Late in the fall the county asked the quarry operators to provide a revised SEPA, which they did.  There are  modest differences in this revised SEPA, but the effect of the revision is to start the comment period over again and the Hearing Examiner scheduled to review the previous appeal has been cancelled.  We have until January 10th to submit comments about the revised SEPA.  
  2. The quarry operators have dropped their appeal of the boundary violation issued by the county. In doing so they are admiting that they have not been in compliance with the existing MRL boundaries and are to make adjustments in the activity around the actual mine pit.
  3. In November, the shoreline management group in the Whatcom County Planning Department issued a notice of violation regarding the construction of the loading facilities at the quarry. When they built this facility in 2006-2007 they did not have a permit.   They have 30 days to initiate a remedial permit application.
  4. There has not been any progress in the application for a water right serving the quarry.  They are still using water for operations without a water right or permit.

The activity around this MRL zoning proposal will be continuing through much of 2012.  We want to make sure that the residents in the Edgemoor Neighborhood Association are fully aware of these developments.  The new website is intended to provide that informaiton.  If you and the other board members think a presentation at one of your meetings would be helpful then let us know.    Kent Nielsen

Notes on Gateway Pacific Terminal Meeting

A Summary of the Presentation by SSA Rep at Edgemoor Neighborhood Meeting

If you didn’t have the opportunity to attend the December 1st presentation regarding the Gateway Pacific Terminal, what follows is a summary based on notes I took. As you might have guessed, it was a “lively” meeting. What came through loud and clear was that the people who asked “questions” (more often statements of position and opinion) were absolutely opposed to the project.

The primary areas of concern seemed to be the following (not in any particular order):

  • Impacts from increased train traffic on neighborhoods, property values & access to waterfront areas.
  • Impacts from the transport of coal, specifically.
  • Environmental concerns ranging from air, water and soil quality to public health.
  • Costs of improvements/modifications to rail crossings.
  • Potential expansion of the facility beyond its currently anticipated capacity.
  • Questions regarding the actual number of local, permanent jobs to be provided.

Rather than attempt to accurately convey the answers given by Craig Cole & Chris Johnson, I am providing links to the printed information they provided. It seems quite comprehensive.  If you have more specific questions about what occurred, I strongly urge you to attend one of the many meetings that will continue to be held throughout the county concerning the project.

We have made contact with BNSF, and it looks as though they will provide a speaker to answer questions specifically relating to the railroad. We will be pursuing that possibility after the first of the year.

Terminal Plan   SSA’s Answers to Terminal Questions   Crosscut Article   Response to Health Concerns